Bookmark: Interesting opinion about Open Access journals

04 Oct

Open AccessA nice publication by Jocelyn Kaiser in Science titled « Free Journals Grow Amid Ongoing Debate » discusses the success of Open Access journals such as PLoS and BioMed Central ones and brings by some presumably controversial points.

I say « presumably controversial » because it appears to me that someone claiming that PLoS ONE publishes only bad quality papers is just stupid and has no objective value (you know, the one scientists always claim from you when they disagree with you. I say « stupid » because here apparently, your opponent is supposed to produced an objectivable and structured argument, but not you). Papers published in open access journals go through the same peer-review process as in any other non open access journal. Or publishing one’s scientific results under one of the Creative Commons licenses means somehow that you are a bad scientist? This question is rhetorical and deliberately provocative 😉

Surprisingly (or not), this Opinion is not open access. You need to be AAAS member of to pay for having access to the full text. Recommended reading anyway.

Poster un commentaire

Publié par le 4 octobre 2010 dans Bookmark, Open access, Science


Étiquettes : , , ,

Votre commentaire

Entrez vos coordonnées ci-dessous ou cliquez sur une icône pour vous connecter:


Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte Déconnexion /  Changer )

Photo Google

Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte Google. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Image Twitter

Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte Twitter. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Photo Facebook

Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte Facebook. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Connexion à %s